DRC signs peace deal with M23 rebels but experts in North Kivu remain sceptical

Weeks after signing a peace deal with Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo has reached an accord with M23 rebels operating in the country’s North Kivu situation. But long-time observers of the DRC’s attempts to revive peace within its borders aren’t ready to celebrate.

Following an initial peace deal with Rwanda closing month, the DRC signed a ceasefire agreement with M23 rebels on Saturday in Qatar.  

In this Statement of Intent, the occasions comply with present protection to civilians and respect Congolese sovereignty. But on the bottom in Goma, provincial capital of North Kivu and below the sustain watch over of Kigali-backed insurgents, observers are sceptical.  

For Congolese journalist and pan-African civil rights activist Maude-Salomé Ekila, this latest agreement is reminiscent of many others that raised hopes when they had been signed but had been trampled underfoot on the altar of the interests of every stakeholder:

“What’s dramatic is that we’ve been systematically reproducing the same patterns for all these years. There’s a system of international predation organized to exploit Congolese resources. And we forget that this is the heart of the matter. And every possible tool is being used so that this predation and this plan, which has been going on for decades now, can achieve certain objectives.”

Like many native observers, Ekila is frustrated by an agreement that demonstrates the inability of the Congolese authorities to get definite the integrity of its territory. 

“You see, we’re once again in a position of great weakness, because we’ve had a defense apparatus that’s been corrupted in every sense and that hasn’t allowed us to face up to the hyper-sophisticated army we had in front of us, an army completely supported by the Rwandan army in reality, which supports the M23, which supports the AFC politico-military platform,” Ekila instructed Africanews.

“And so we found ourselves in a weak position to negotiate. What did we negotiate? That’s the question: are we going to be able to meet the deadline set in this communiqué?”

The peril, Ekila says, is justice:

“From the moment when the protagonists know that they can do it again, that in any case, there will be agreements that will not be kept and that will reproduce other militias, because there has been no justice, because justice has been bartered on the altar of so-called peace, just as justice is bartered on the altar of pseudo-democracy every time, we find ourselves in a situation where the facts are repeated. It’s cyclical and, as a result, a system of predation quietly goes on its way.”

The Statement of Intent will approach into force without delay upon signing and ought to be utilized by 29 July. It offers for the opening of declare negotiations for a comprehensive peace agreement by 8 August. These discussions will be in line with the agreement signed closing month in Washington between the DRC and Rwanda.

The aim is to gain and signal this comprehensive peace agreement by 18 August. Experts, nonetheless, doubt that the timetable will be met.