Addis Abeba — The Horn of Africa, prolonged fashioned by strategic pursuits and colonial legacies, is once more rising as a heart of intense diplomatic engagement. With this pattern, Ethiopia has increasingly extra positioned itself as a proactive regional actor, adopting a multipolar diplomatic diagram to conquer the restrictions of its landlocked geography. In distinction, Egypt has pursued a extra defensive distant places coverage, in particular in the case of the Immense Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) and what it perceives as threats to its Pink Sea security doctrine. Somalia occupies a strategically ambiguous dwelling, balancing the influence of these two regional powers while contending with ongoing interior instability. In the intervening time, Somaliland has attracted sudden diplomatic consideration, skillfully leveraging its coastal geography to set apart new global partnerships.
This commentary examines three key pillars of Ethiopia’s increasingly extra assertive distant places coverage: the management of the GERD, the strategic push for maritime discover entry to by means of a Memorandum of Idea (MoU) with Somaliland, and the country’s calibrated response to challenging world vitality dynamics, exemplified by its accession to BRICS. By examining the reactions of regional actors, the article explores how the Horn of Africa is being reshaped–no longer totally by battle, however by competing visions of sovereignty, regional alignment, and political company.
Pillar One: GERD as a geopolitical declaration
Ethiopia has firmly established its plot on the GERD, grounded in a solid doctrine of sovereignty and honest autonomy. Rejecting any association that can impose legally binding stipulations on the filling or operation of the dam–in particular concerning the filling–Addis Abeba has adopted a stance of honest minimalism. As a replace of going in new treaties that would constrain its sovereign rights, Ethiopia refers to the 2015 Declaration of Recommendations (DoP) as a ample framework for cooperation, emphasizing that the agreement doesn’t require additional honest ratification.
Whereas critics often converse this plot as obstinate or obstructionist, it is far extra precisely described as a calculated assertion of put up-colonial water rights. Notably, Ethiopia’s capability is no longer in accordance with defense power escalation, nor does it dissipate excessive diplomatic capital. As an different, it reaffirms the normative precept that upstream riparian states possess equal and inherent rights to carry out basically the most of transboundary water resources for national pattern.
On this context, the GERD has developed into higher than a hydroelectric challenge; it has change correct into a geopolitical converse. It symbolically rejects the legacy of colonial-generation water-sharing preparations–in particular the 1929 and 1959 Nile Waters Agreements, which closely appreciated Egypt. As such, the GERD stands as an emblem of African self-risk, reworking Ethiopia’s pursuit of equitable discover entry to to pure resources correct into a broader pan-African fable of liberation and resistance to externally imposed honest constraints.
The profitable articulation of this fable critically enhances Ethiopia’s strategic autonomy, both globally and regionally. As a consequence, the GERD stands because the foundational pillar of Ethiopia’s burgeoning geopolitical doctrine: a reordering of Nile Basin geopolitics premised on national independence, a reinterpretation of existing honest frameworks, and a rebalancing of regional vitality dynamics.
Pillar Two: MoU with Somaliland
Ethiopia’s most geopolitically ambitious endeavor in most recent reminiscence passed off in January 2024, with the signing of a MoU with Somaliland, a de facto however no longer a de jure republic. As mentioned in the official readout, the MoU is supposed to “pave the way to realize the aspiration of Ethiopia to secure access to the sea and diversify its access to seaports.” This marks a well-known departure from Ethiopia’s traditionally cautious distant places coverage ethos and shows a broader shift in the direction of a extra assertive, ardour-driven capability to global family.
At the core of the MoU lies Ethiopia’s most pressing strategic affirm: sovereign discover entry to to the sea. Since Eritrea’s secession in 1993, rendering Ethiopia landlocked, the nation has predominantly relied on distant places ports–essentially Djibouti–for virtually all its maritime change. Whereas outdated Ethiopian administrations pursued this intention by means of discreet diplomacy and industrial agreements, the brand new authorities has adopted a extra assertive approach, aiming to basically reshape regional geopolitics. The MoU with Somaliland, therefore, represents a decisive transfer in the direction of achieving both maritime and military freedom.
The GERD has developed into higher than a hydroelectric challenge; it has change correct into a geopolitical converse.”
The worldwide response was swift and a number of. The Arab League issued a critique, subtly focusing on Ethiopia’s ambitions by citing the aptitude for militarization of the Pink Sea by non-littoral states as a well-known risk. Egypt, already embroiled in a contentious dispute with Ethiopia over the GERD, additionally criticized the MoU, asserting that the agreement constitutes an egregious interference in the Pink Sea’s precarious balance. These reactions underscore the destabilizing implications of Ethiopia’s new distant places coverage trajectory. Addis Abeba’s actions clearly direct that the role quo isn’t very any longer acceptable; indeed, Ethiopia is actively participating in defining a new one.
It be noteworthy that the MoU additionally indicators a broader shift in African diplomatic trends, challenging from normative principles in the direction of realpolitik. By signing an MoU with Somaliland, regardless of Somalia’s persevered assertion of sovereignty over the territory and the African Union’s adherence to colonial-generation boundaries, Ethiopia has prioritized its strategic pursuits over multilateral consensus. This step signifies a measured diplomatic maturity, dictated by pragmatic reasoning in preference to ideological agreement. It additionally foreshadows a renewed willingness to behave unilaterally, in particular touching on famous national pursuits reminiscent of maritime discover entry to.
This pattern carries well-known strategic implications. A attainable Ethiopian presence in Berbera would plot the nation in shut proximity to the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, an most well-known maritime choke point connecting the Indian Ocean to the Suez Canal. This kind of presence would no longer handiest enhance Ethiopia’s strategic reach however additionally additional entrench it within the geopolitics of the Indian Ocean-Pink Sea hall–an increasingly extra contested dwelling animated world powers fancy China, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Russia, and the USA. On this context, gaining port discover entry to is rarely truly merely an cease in itself; it is an effort by Ethiopia to change into an famous part in the strategic calculations of key world and regional actors.
The implications of the MoU extend beyond logistical and military concerns. It indicators a elementary shift in Ethiopia’s distant places coverage–from a survivalist, dependency-driven posture to one rooted in strategic independence and assertive regionalism. The willingness to occupy interplay with a de facto direct, even at the expense of established diplomatic norms, shows a broader departure from ideology-centered diplomacy in the direction of a realpolitik, ardour-based mostly mostly capability. In doing so, Ethiopia has made it decided that it isn’t very any longer confined by the constraints of passive diplomacy. As an different, it is far willing to take calculated dangers in pursuit of its prolonged-term national pursuits.
Furthermore, the MoU has advance to symbolize an most well-known recalibration of Ethiopia’s strategic outlook. It challenges damaged-down understandings of sovereignty, redefines the protection structure of the Horn of Africa, and positions Ethiopia as a rising geopolitical actor in the Pink Sea and Indian Ocean areas. This rising distant places coverage direction is at risk of be characterized by a renewed and famous focal point on national ardour, regional influence, and maritime ambition. Crucially, this pattern means that Ethiopia is no longer handiest solidifying its plot as a continental land vitality however is additionally laying the groundwork to change correct into a maritime vitality–one succesful of projecting its pursuits across the plot in the Twenty first century.
Pillar Three: BRICS accession
Ethiopia has additionally repositioned itself as a skillful actor within the evolving multipolar world affirm, navigating a course between damaged-down Western alliances and the rising influence of the World South. Amid increasing global opponents, Addis Abeba has adopted a relaxed diplomatic balancing act–asserting famous pattern aid from Western companions while actively participating with rising vitality blocs reminiscent of BRICS.
This twin-track approach was exemplified by Ethiopia’s accession to the BRICS–a well-known geopolitical shift. On the opposite hand, Ethiopian officials had been cautious to physique this transfer no longer as a rejection of the West, however as an financial diversification effort. They emphasised that the resolution aimed to amplify opportunities for financial growth and pattern, in preference to alienate prolonged-standing companions, in particular the USA. This nuanced capability has enabled Ethiopia to take care of cooperation in a must occupy areas reminiscent of meals security, public health, and humanitarian motivate–sectors where U.S. enhance remains extremely well-known. This diplomatic balancing act represents one of Ethiopia’s most understated but excellent achievements. Despite its increasing alignment with World South powers, Ethiopia has persevered to receive immense U.S. motivate.
Ethiopia’s skill to take care of solid ties with the West while deepening its cooperation with BRICS participants–especially China, Russia, and India–demonstrates a cosmopolitan put collectively of diplomatic compartmentalization. As a replace of ghastly tensions with Western donors, Ethiopian diplomats occupy prioritized shared humanitarian and pattern targets, even as Addis Abeba actively courts non-Western companions below the BRICS framework.
This strategic maneuvering has yielded tangible advantages. By tapping into BRICS-backed pattern financing and varied different diplomatic channels, Ethiopia has broadened its discover entry to to capital, reduced dependence on Western political stipulations, and enhanced its global company. Most importantly, this implies has enabled Ethiopia to manual decided of the vulnerabilities linked with over-reliance on a single geopolitical bloc, thereby strengthening its capacity to pursue an self sustaining and varied distant places coverage.
The MoU [with Somaliland] indicators a broader shift in African diplomatic trends, challenging from normative principles in the direction of realpolitik.”
Furthermore, a well-known diplomatic realignment is underway in the higher Horn of Africa. The decline of Frigid Battle militaristic affiliations has ushered in a new transactional generation within the global system. On this emergent affirm, ideological adherence holds less sway than the tangible utility derived from engagement with numerous patrons. Both Somaliland and Ethiopia occupy, to a famous extent, capitalized on this fluid ambiance to enhance their geostrategic positions.
Despite its lack of formal recognition, Somaliland has developed well-known partnerships–most critically with the United Arab Emirates–and, critically, has entered correct into a historic port-discover entry to agreement with Ethiopia. These trends underscore a increasing shift away from recognition because the one real real measure of global legitimacy. In contexts where change, security, and infrastructure are at stake, transactional pursuits are increasingly extra taking precedence.
In stark distinction, regardless of its solid family with Western powers and Gulf allies, Egypt’s capacity to exert regional influence has been constrained by geographical limitations and the increasing assertiveness of varied regional actors. Equally, Somalia remains reliant on Western and Turkish enhance for its security, but it lacks the strategic agility to diversify its global relationships to the extent that Ethiopia has achieved.
At final, it is far famous to spotlight that Ethiopia’s distant places coverage illustrates how engagement with BRICS and persevered cooperation with Western donors are no longer mutually unfamiliar. On the different, they wait on as complementary devices within a coherent distant places coverage framework. This shows a extra nuanced accomplish of strategic autonomy–one grounded in the purposeful imperatives of national pattern. Because the area vitality structure continues to shift, Ethiopia’s capability can also well wait on as a mannequin for varied World South international locations looking out out for to navigate a multipolar world without compromising crucial partnerships.
Regional Reactions: Defensive postures, strategic ambiguity
Ethiopia’s assertive diplomacy has brought on well-known, though a number of, reactions from key regional actors, essentially Egypt and Somalia. Egypt’s distant places coverage in the Horn is predicated on two elementary pursuits: maintaining its historical water entitlements from the Nile and asserting a preeminent strategic plot in the Pink Sea. Ethiopia’s actions occupy without lengthen challenged both these pursuits. Cairo, in response, has pursued a coverage of defensive activism, employing signaling, alliance building, and legalism so as to counter Ethiopia’s increasing influence.
In accordance with the Ethiopia-Somaliland Memorandum of Idea, Egypt issued a solid converse declaring that “no landlocked country would be allowed to build a naval base in the Red Sea.” On the opposite hand, Cairo for the time being lacks the logistical capacity to unilaterally set apart in power this kind of plot. Its relationship with Somalia has largely been symbolic, serving extra to reaffirm Egypt’s presence as a regional actor than to carry out any concrete diplomatic or defense power entrance towards Ethiopia.
Diplomacy in the Horn of Africa is now characterized by pragmatic alliances, astute strategic maneuvering, and calculated ambiguity.”
On the quite loads of hand, Somalia’s diplomatic response to the Ethiopia-Somaliland MoU has been characterized by minimalistic eloquence, reflecting what would be described as a posture of controlled ambiguity. The Somali authorities faces a twin affirm: on one hand, defending its sovereignty and jurisdiction over Somaliland as an internationally identified entity; on the quite loads of, navigating the complex geopolitics fashioned by its puny enforcement capacity and regional isolation.
Underneath President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, the authorities in Mogadishu has vocally condemned the MoU as a violation of Somalia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. On the opposite hand, it has been cautious no longer to physique the agreement as a casus belli, a conscious resolution that speaks to concerns beyond mere expediency. Geographic proximity, the truth that Ethiopia and Somalia fragment well-known change routes, and Ethiopia’s involvement in Somalia by means of the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) occupy all constrained Mogadishu’s capacity to escalate the dispute. Domestically, Somalia continues to grapple with fragmented governance, chronic insecurity, and worn institutions–factors that additional inhibit the formulation of an assertive distant places coverage.
This cautious ambiguity, while tactically risk-averse, has successfully positioned Ethiopia in a solid diplomatic plot. Addis Abeba has reframed its relationship with Somaliland, emphasizing that it doesn’t constitute a breach of Somalia’s sovereignty however slightly represents a negotiation process grounded in mutual back–in particular discover entry to to the sea and alter. Ethiopia’s appeals to regional integration, port security, and financial growth occupy quietly resonated with obvious African and Gulf states, thereby undermining Somalia’s efforts to rally a consensus towards the agreement.
Even though Egypt and the Arab League occupy traditionally expressed symbolic unity with Mogadishu, their enhance has largely remained declarative in preference to substantive. In the intervening time, Ethiopia has evolved a proactive distant places coverage rooted in non-alignment and South-South cooperation, aligning closely with BRICS member states and cultivating new partnerships. This capability has weakened Egypt’s skill to mobilize a unified Arab-African coalition in defense of Somalia, leaving Mogadishu increasingly extra isolated.
Review in at free of fee AllAfrica Newsletters
Salvage the most modern in African knowledge delivered straight to your inbox
Somalia has refrained from internationalizing the dispute or escalating it to a level of immense deterrence, leaving it weak to Ethiopia’s extra nuanced and multifaceted diplomacy. Whereas Somalia maintains a morally and legally superior plot, Ethiopia has skillfully inverted the fable, redefining the dispute no longer as aggression however as a subject of infrastructure pattern, vitality, and regional maritime connectivity. On this context, Somalia’s silence can’t be interpreted as strategic; slightly, it shows institutional paralysis. Such an ineffective response dangers conferring de facto legitimacy on Ethiopia’s actions and jeopardizing Somalia’s prospects in future negotiations.
As a consequence, Somalia’s lack of skill to mount a coherent counter-diplomacy dangers rendering its sovereignty claims purely rhetorical, as Addis Ababa continues to amplify its influence and normalize family with non-damaged-down companions fancy Somaliland.
Redrawing geopolitical equation
The evolving diplomatic panorama in the Horn of Africa has given upward thrust to a new regional equation, marked by a number of defining dynamics. Most well-known amongst these is the shift from multilateralism to bilateralism. Regional our bodies such because the African Union (AU) and the Intergovernmental Authority on Construction (IGAD) occupy largely proven ineffective in addressing rising disputes. This institutional weak point has created dwelling for bilateral engagements, enabling states to come their strategic pursuits out of doors damaged-down frameworks.
A 2d famous pattern is the ascendancy of strategic hurry over honest discourse. A decided divergence has emerged between the approaches of international locations fancy Egypt and Somalia–that rely closely on honest frameworks to affirm sovereignty–and these of Ethiopia and Somaliland, international locations that prioritize notify, consequence-driven solutions. This pattern shows a broader regional sample in which purposeful, strategic gains are increasingly extra valued over rigid honest interpretations.
Thirdly, ambiguity has change into an spectacular diplomatic instrument. Strategic silence now serves as an efficient tool, allowing actors across the plot to de-escalate tensions while conserving the flexibility to adapt their positions. This deliberate ambiguity has enabled stakeholders to navigate complex geopolitical realities without foreclosing future diplomatic alternatives.
Conclusion
Diplomacy in the Horn of Africa is now characterized by pragmatic alliances, astute strategic maneuvering, and calculated ambiguity. By its assertive strategic endeavors, Ethiopia has maintained autonomy over its pivotal national challenge, the GERD; evolved its efforts to get maritime discover entry to by the exhaust of the MoU with Somaliland; and received membership in the influential BRICS bloc. By these efforts, Ethiopia is actively reshaping the regional panorama.
In distinction, Egypt and Somalia seem like struggling to adapt, with their reactive and defensive approaches proving insufficient to stem Ethiopia’s increasing strategic momentum. The longer term of the plot is often fashioned less by damaged-down honest agreements and extra by the strategic positioning and diplomatic agility of its key actors, with Ethiopia for the time being at the forefront. AS
Editor’s Expose: Gulaid Yusuf Idaan is a senior lecturer and researcher that specialise in diplomacy, politics, and global family in the Horn of Africa. He’ll even be contacted at [email protected]
