Tensions ran high on the Federal High Court docket in Abuja on Thursday as the trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous Of us of Biafra (IPOB), resumed with heated courtroom exchanges and mounting frustration over delays from the prosecution.
Presiding over the proceedings, the trial pick issued a stern warning to the Federal Govt, criticizing its criminal team for repeated procedural lapses and a scarcity of preparedness.
“You’ve to pick six days within two weeks and display cloak your entire witnesses. In the occasion you fail to impact so, I will strike out your case as archaic,” the pick mentioned firmly, drawing a combine of approval and surprise from these display cloak in the courtroom.
Leer Brushed apart
The trial session began with the cross-examination of the prosecution’s second opinion, but mercurial unraveled.
The opinion gave conflicting responses, generally saying “I don’t know” and contradicting earlier statements. His lack of readability and credibility led the court docket to discharge him from the opinion stand.
The inconvenience worsened when the prosecution failed to display cloak its third opinion. In response, the pick adjourned the case to Would possibly presumably perhaps furthermore simply 28 and 29, and June 6, 16, 18, and 19, 2025, warning the criminal team, led by Senior Advocate of Nigeria Adegboyega Awomolo, to streamline its opinion checklist.
“We will now not continue like this. Decrease your witnesses so this matter can finish soon,” the pick mentioned, clearly displeased.
In incompatibility, the defense team, led by pale Attorney Frequent of the Federation, Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN), looked quiet and effectively-prepared.
They submitted video proof geared toward discrediting the prosecution’s case.
Amongst the flicks turned into a clip of Imo Allege Governor Hope Uzodimma, who beforehand blamed IPOB for violence in Orlu, now suggesting the violence might furthermore bear had political motivations.
Extra photographs featured DSS Director Oluwatosin Ajayi and retired Frequent T.Y. Danjuma, both urging voters to defend themselves.
The prosecution’s opinion, then again, refused to commentary on the flicks, saying it turned into now not his role to interpret such public statements.
Grisly-Examination Finds Weaknesses in Prosecution’s Case
Below intense questioning from the defense, the opinion admitted he had now not for my portion investigated any IPOB individuals and had no bid proof linking Kanu to violent exercise.
He furthermore confirmed that he had now not spoke back to a letter from the Attorney Frequent’s place of work and had failed to submit an decent investigation represent to the court docket.
